Which candidate really appeals to selfishness? (those that can be bribed)
Which candidate offers empty promises?
Which candidate is campaigning on trying to change that which he has no control over?
Which Candidate is only telling you what you want to hear?
Which candidate has supporters committing election fraud?
Which candidates campaign is raising millions in illegal and untraceable donations?
Which candidate has already lied to you?
Which candidate changes his position to appeal to the audience?
Which candidate is the epitome of hubris?
Which candidate wants to bankrupt American business?
Which candidate will defer to the destruction of Isreal?
Which candidate may not be U.S. born?
Which candidate associates with people of questionable character?
Which candidate thinks government should make your personal decisions?
Which candidate will result in less freedom and liberty?
Which candidate will sunset the Bill of Rights?
Which candidate will give the Supreme Court unlimited power?
Which candidate will squash freedom of speech?
Which candidate will abolish the right to bear arms?
Which candidate has no respect for your religious beliefs?
Which candidate is a relative unknown?
Which candidate is in it for himself?
Which candidate has the dangerous ego?
Which candidate appeals to mob rule and not the rule of law?
Which candidate is more divisive?
Which candidate will be bad for America and the world?

Which Candidate? Barack Obama!


More like Hubris…

From Wikipedia:

Hubris, sometimes spelled hybris (ancient Greek ὕβρις), is a term used in modern English to indicate overweening pride, self-confidence, superciliousness, or arrogance, often resulting in fatal retribution. In ancient Greece, hubris referred to actions which, intentionally or not, shamed and humiliated the victim, and frequently the perpetrator as well. It was most evident in the public and private actions of the powerful and rich. The word was also used to describe actions of those who challenged the gods or their laws, especially in Greek tragedy, resulting in the protagonist’s downfall.

Obama and Biden keep belittling John McCain and Sarah Palin for ‘clinging’ to policies that preserve the Bill of Rights, rewards the industriousness of entrepreneurial people, keeps the tax burden down for all Americans, and the desire the change the status quo and shake up Washington.

Here is a short list of the things Obama and Biden think you should given up and stop clinging to:

1. Guns
2. Religion
3. Freedom of Speech
4. Liberty

They are hoping the economic hard times will push you vote to for them as they promise you more government handouts. Except that this time, the cost of those handouts will be the liberty and freedom of us all.

Isn’t that socialism? Or could it be, Communism?

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.

– – Karl Marx

In a higher phase of communist society, after the enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor, and therewith also the antithesis between mental and physical labor, has vanished; after labor has become not only a means of life but life’s prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly—only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!

Democrats hate middle class white people.

So what does Obama have in store for us?

Why is Barack Obama unable to separate politics from putting America first? Obama claims he is not able to be a candidate and keep the countries interest first at the same time. I thought it was Obamas’ idea? Didn’t Obama say that he contacted John McCain first? It wasn’t that long ago, did he forget? And how can his campaign say that John McCains desire to postpone the debate, put the country first, and work to address this disastrous issue a stunt? Does he think the American public stupid?

Dodd, Kanjorski, Frank, and Obama Richer, You aren't

Dodd, Kanjorski, Frank, and Obama Richer, You aren't

So how did all this happen? Our Wall Street financial institutions are in deep trouble directly because of the housing and mortgage crisis, namely Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This problem has cascaded from the mortgage crisis to just about ever area of our financial system. A system we all depend on. So how did Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac get into trouble?

This all started back in 1977 when Congress and President Carter signed into law a bill titled the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), it was later modified by the Clinton Administration in order to create mandates on banks and mortgage houses to provide “opportunities” to those wanting to buy a home but couldn’t under standard mortgage practices afford them. A cleaver way to give hand outs to the poor. (Once again the road to hell is paved with good intentions) The majority of these mortgages were provided by, you guessed it, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These organizations hold about half of all the housing loans in the United States.

On September 11, 2003 George Bush and the administration recommended significant regulatory overhaul to the housing finance industry, specifically Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The new regulatory agency would be able to regulate and determine whether Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are adequately managing the risks of their ballooning portfolios, which at the time was well over 1.6 trillion dollars. In the article is said:

There is a general recognition that the supervisory system for housing-related government-sponsored enterprises neither has the tools, nor the stature, to deal effectively with the current size, complexity and importance of these enterprises,” Treasury Secretary John W. Snow told the House Financial Services Committee in an appearance with Housing Secretary Mel Martinez, who also backed the plan.

At the time, Barney Frank aggressively thwarted reform efforts by the Bush administration and prevented its passage. Since then Frank has been quick to blame republican deregulation. “Frank was and remains a stalwart defender of Fannie Mae, which is now under FBI investigation along with its sister organization Freddie Mac”. We all know, Barney Frank ought to be under investigation as well. I say hang him now.

Prominent Democrats ran Fannie Mae – Yet the media won’t report that.

Prominent Democrats ran Fannie Mae, the same government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) that donated campaign cash to top Democrats. And one of Fannie Mae’s main defenders in the House – Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., a recipient of more than $40,000 in campaign donations from Fannie since 1989 – was once romantically involved with a Fannie Mae executive.

Frank was and remains a stalwart defender of Fannie Mae, which is now under FBI investigation along with its sister organization Freddie Mac, American International Group Inc. (NYSE:AIG) and Lehman Brothers (NYSE:LEH) – all recently participants in government bailouts. But Frank has derailed efforts to regulate the institution, as well as denying it posed any financial risk. Frank’s office has been unresponsive to efforts by the Business & Media Institute to comment on these potential conflicts of interest.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Invest in Democrats

John McCain and other Republicans attempted to prevent this issue years ago, but were stopped by the Democrats.

Speech is only free if it furthers the campaign and election of Barack Obama. Is it any wonder why so little about his relationships with Antoin Rezko and Bill Ayers has reached the media. Oh, that’s right. The MSM (ABC, NBC, CBS) are all part of the Obama campaign.

So now they (Obama’s campaign and the MSM) are trying to silence David Freddoso, author of the book “The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media’s Favorite Candidate.” As a public service, I’ll list the chapter titles of the book here.

In his book the chapter lineup is as follows:

Introduction: The Rhetoric vs. Reality
Chapter 1: Obama and the Chicago Machine – Not a Reformer
Chapter 2: Obama Games Springfield
Chapter 3: The Accidental Candidate
Chapter 4: Obamessiah
Chapter 5: Obama in Washington – Still not a reformer
Chapter 6: The Stealth Liberal
Chapter 7: The Radical Influences
Chapter 8: Reverend Wright and Obamas Faith
Chapter 9: Obama’s foriegn Policy – Inexperience and Uncertainty
Chapter 10: Abortion: Barack Obama’s America
Chapter 11: Pinstripe patronage: Obama takes care of his friends

The video below give you some idea of who Baracks associates are, and what they left behind in Chicago.

Be sure to visit http://www.obamatruth.org/.