Isn’t that socialism? Or could it be, Communism?

From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.

– – Karl Marx

In a higher phase of communist society, after the enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor, and therewith also the antithesis between mental and physical labor, has vanished; after labor has become not only a means of life but life’s prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly—only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!


Technology to enforce the Herd Mentality of the Democrats

For a couple of hundred years our representatives have relied on their constituents to cast the appropriate vote to ensure their reelection. Recently house democrats reallocated agricultural earmarks originally slated for the study of capturing and reusing the flatulence of dairy farm cow populations to U.S. Department of Agriculture project that will automate the remote herding of cattle and other livestock. By outfitting the livestock with radio controlled technology the researchers found that what cowboys have been doing since the 19th century could be done remotely. For generations, cowboys have used commands such as “gee” and “haw” to tell their cattle to move right or left. Now with satellite video, GPS, and micro radio transmitter and receiver technology this all becomes controllable remotely.

Researchers were alarmed and surprised to discover that voting age liberal democrats were susceptible to same technology.

Barack Obama consistently votes for, or votes present, on issues relating to increasing taxes and transferring wealth from those who have worked for it to those who do not. This is not an issue of having empathy for those in need. I can’t think of many people who don’t. What is at issue is how do we help those in need? Do we make them forever dependent on the state or is the help temporary until they can support themselves?

Sure, sure, Barack Obamas ‘PLAN’ says is lowers taxes on everyone except the rich, and the rich is defined as anyone earning over 250k. Now that the dollar has been devalued so much, what will 250k be equivalent to a few years from now? How is rich defined?